twitter

Tuesday 6 February 2018

Food consumption and dietary intakes in 36,448 adults and their association with irritable bowel syndrome: Nutrinet-Santé study.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan 14;11:1756283X17746625. doi: 10.1177/1756283X17746625. eCollection 2018. Torres MJ1, Sabate JM2, Bouchoucha M3, Buscail C4, Hercberg S4, Julia C4. Author information 1 Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle (EREN), UMR U1153 Inserm/U1125 Inra/Cnam/Univ Paris 13, Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologies et Biostatistiques Sorbonne Paris Cité, UFR SMBH 74 rue Marcel Cachin, 93017 Bobigny, France. 2 Service d'Hépato Gastro Entérologie, CHU Louis Mourier (AP-HP), Colombes, France. 3 Service d'Hépato Gastro Entérologie, Hôpital Avicenne (AP-HP), Bobigny, France. 4 Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle (EREN), Centre de Recherche en Epidémiologie et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, Bobigny, France Département de Santé Publique, Hôpital Avicenne (AP-HP), Bobigny, France. Abstract INTRODUCTION: Diet plays an important role for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to compare the diets in terms of food consumption and nutrient intake between subjects with IBS and controls in a large French population. METHODS: This study included 36,448 subjects from the Nutrinet-Santé cohort study, who completed a questionnaire pertaining to functional bowel disorders based on the Rome III criteria. Dietary data were obtained from at least three self-administered 24 h records via the internet. Association between IBS and diet was evaluated by comparison tests controlled for gender, age and total energy intake (ANCOVA tests). RESULTS: Subjects included were mainly women (76.9%) and the mean age was 50.2 ± 14.2 years. Among these individuals, 1870 (5.1%) presented with IBS. Compared to healthy controls, they had significantly lower consumption of milk (74.6 versus 88.4 g/day; p < 0.0001), yogurt (108.4 versus 115.5 g/day; p = 0.001), fruits (192.3 versus 203.8 g/day; p < 0.001), and higher soft non-sugared beverages (1167.2 versus 1122.9 ml/day; p < 0.001). They had higher total energy intake (2028.9 versus 1995.7 kcal/day; p < 0.001), with higher intakes of lipids (38.5 versus 38.1% of total energy intake; p = 0.001) and lower intakes of proteins (16.4 versus 16.8% of total energy intake; p < 0.0001), as well as micronutrients (calcium, potassium, zinc and vitamins B2, B5 and B9, all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large sample, these findings suggest that dietary intake of subjects suffering from IBS differs from that of control subjects. They may have adapted their diet according to symptoms following medical or non-medical recommendations. KEYWORDS: diet; epidemiology; irritable bowel syndrome; micronutrients; nutrition